In this discussion I have presented a
positive case for panexperientialism, showing how this view addresses issues
upon which the materialist/reductionist picture cannot gain any traction on its
own terms.
The pages down the right hand side comprise an essay in defence of panexperientialism and should be read in order.
Conclusion
Quoting Wittgenstein, “A picture
held us captive” (Philosophical Investigations, 115). This is seemingly the
case with regard to the materialist/reductionist picture - a picture into which
we are possibly seduced by the success of the scientific enterprise in helping
us to conceptually model and understand the objective world. But this picture
is not forced upon us by logical necessity, nor by empirical evidence. The
upshot is that although many are quick to dismiss panexperientialism, this is
an illicit move in the game, especially given that the materialist/reductionist
picture exhibits profound problems when pushed to its limits. In physics, the
measurement problem, delayed choice histories, nonlocality, and the quantum
Zeno effect, all of which present such a challenge for the
materialist/reductionist picture, are rendered less enigmatic by
panexperientialism. The question arises as to the mechanism by which the
consistency of characteristics is ensured across instances of
"dissolution" into the wholeness, but by virtue of its very
indivisibility the implied wholeness is beyond language and logic.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment